Trump takes aim at city and state climate laws in executive order

Dharna Noor

Donald Trump is taking aim and city- and state-led fossil fuel accountability efforts, which have been hailed as a last source of hope for the climate amid the president’s ferociously anti-environment agenda.

In a Tuesday executive order, Trump instructed the Department of Justice to “stop the enforcement” of state climate laws, which his administration has suggested are unconstitutional or otherwise unenforceable.

The president called out New York and Vermont, both of which have passed “climate superfund” laws requiring major fossil fuel companies to help pay for damages from extreme weather.

“These State laws and policies are fundamentally irreconcilable with my Administration’s objective to unleash American energy,” the executive order says. “They should not stand.”

He also targeted the dozens of lawsuits brought by states, cities and counties against big oil in recent years, accusing the industry of intentionally covering up the climate risks of their products and seeking compensation for climate impacts.

The move left advocates outraged. “This order is an illegal, disgusting attempt to force everyday people to pay for the rising toll of climate disasters, while shielding the richest people in the world from accountability,” said Aru Shiney-Ajay, the executive director of the youth-led environmental justice group the Sunrise Movement.

The new order came as Trump touted new moves to revive the coal, the dirtiest and most expensive fossil fuel.

Key events

Speaker Mike Johnson delays House budget vote after GOP rebellion threatened defeat

Last night a beleaguered Mike Johnson canceled a vote on the Senate’s budget resolution as it became obvious that, despite his earlier projections of confidence, too many Republican deficit hawks would vote against and doom the measure.

It’s a huge blow for Johnson, who along with his team spent days scrambling and wrangling with those GOP holdouts agitating for greater spending cuts in Trump’s “big beautiful bill”. Given the slim Republican majority in the House, only four votes against would have sunk the resolution – and, according to Axios, dozens were threatening rebellion.

Republicans need to adopt the measure in order to enact a sweeping party-line package that would enact Trump’s domestic agenda – including tax cuts, military spending, energy policy, border security investments – this year. But conservative fiscal hawks refused to back the Senate budget blueprint, which contains far fewer spending cuts than the version passed by the House in February.

Politico reports that Johnson and House leadership will explore either amending the Senate bill or going straight to conference with the other chamber and working out differences there. Changing the bill, however, as Axios notes, would force the Senate to vote once again, which could put the two chambers in a stalemate.

Johnson remains under pressure to find further cuts in federal spending to satisfy the fiscal hawks in his party, but has said many times that House Republicans would not cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits. But in order to meet their huge deficit reduction targets, it’s unclear where else the money would come from if not from cuts to Medicaid.

It’s back to the drawing board for speaker Mike Johnson, who couldn’t get the budget blueprint for Trump’s agenda through the House on Wednesday. Photograph: Nathan Posner/SOPA Images/REX/Shutterstock

Source link


administrator