Advice Resolutions Law – Court Case Chronicles corrupt Judge Peter Paterson Jedburgh Sheriff Court

You are less likely to get justice in the Scottish Borders Criminal Justice System if you are Black (a person of colour) than if you are White and that is very much the case outside of the great Metropolis of London. In the Scottish Borders, within particular Towns, much of the court cases are presided over by a corrupt, racist, and bribe taking Judge named “Sheriff Peter Paterson” whose decisions are much like those out of the Cowboys of the Wild West. However, there is no Clint Eastwood of Rawhide in this show down, and no gun slinging.. Just over judicial racist thuggery that you might expect from a White Middleclass/Upper Class racist Judge who makes up the law and takes bribes as he goes along in judicial criminality.. Judge Paterson was passed a case from the England Jurisdiction emanating from some 15 years ago.. Yes that is right “15 years ago”. This is how it started: A car was alleged to be travelling at 36mph in a 30mph zone the year of 2007 in the district of Woolwich, London. A Notice of Intended Prosecution was served within 14 days by first class post (it must be as that is the law), the case was then heard at Bromley Magistrates’ Court who convicted and sentenced believe it or not on “Confiscation” by a District Judge Carr, who must have taken something we would not have for breakfast or was he plainly racist and corrupt from the start of the illegally constructed criminally liable decision? It is comedic but very serious because compensation arises only in Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 cases of which this is not one. We mean the alleged offender did not collect the camera fines did they? So how does Confiscation arise? If this was a Punch and Judy Show Sheriff Paterson would be Punch but who would be Judy? Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights says ” no punishment without law”. Law ceases to exist in this case because the convictions and sentencing are made up in the most novel sense. Confiscation is not found anywhere in the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 nor the Courts Sentencing Guidelines for alleged speeding camera cases. That decision was plain and simply illegal and corrupt. The decision was appealed to the Crown Court who decided the same as the Bromley Magistrates’ Court again illegally and corruptly. So what does that tell all you people out there about injustice and the Courts of Injustice? Well it says a lot does it not. Now it gets worse, because the alleged offender gets served documents stating that they owe “Compensation”. Compensation? Compensation is not found anywhere in the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 nor the Courts Sentencing Guidelines for alleged speeding offences. That decision was plain and simply illegal and corrupt. Remember, a speeding camera does not have blood running through its veins, it has no heart, and it cannot breath and does not suffer personal injury. So how did compensation arise? So people a Black alleged offender can be criminalised and face prosecution on made up fairy tale laws at the drop of a crooked Judge’s pen. This is also a case of forgery of papers served under the Forgery Act 1981. It’s a very criminal judiciary out there, but we are fighting this insanely institutionally racist and corrupt case from start to end. Justice must not only be done but seen to be done as the famous case states. Keep on watching our Court Case Chronicles videos and learn about the United Kingdom’s racist and corrupt Criminal Justice System at work. Fight your battles against the seismic judicial corruption and Win Win Win…..See you at an Advice Resolutions Law Consultancy Court Cases Chronicles video soon. Stay Safe. You never know when you will be the next survivor of the judicial attack on your human rights so stay alert and learn as you go along..

source