Corrupt Doj Must Be Accountable For Manipulating Data in the Infinity Two Global Case
https://www.defendmlmfreedom.com
The First Amendment gives us the right to free speech. The Free Press offers checks and balances against corruption. When cases don’t rise to the attention of the Free Press, we must expose the truth or forego justice. These videos expose hidden truths from the I2G trial, aiming to protect others from due process and Constitutional rights violations that could lead to the imprisonment of any MLM distributor.
Forty pages of documentation have been sent to Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, the Office of Professional Responsibility, James Comer, the Judiciary and Oversight Committees of Congress and the Senate, and the Department against weaponization of government.
Did the Corrupt DoJ commit multiple felonies in the prosecution of the i2G Case to get convictions?
1.) It lied to the Court repeatedly about exonerating data it subpoenaed seven years before the trial, which showed over $38 million in I2G Commissions paid to I2G Distributors deemed alleged victims.
2.) It manipulated exonerating data one week before the trial to filter out $ 28 million in commissions (gains) paid to alleged victims as the “source” of their purchases. The deception manufactured losses that were radically inflated, which were shared through multiple experts as “truthful,”
3.) It encouraged multiple witnesses to represent false data as i2G gains and losses, despite knowledge that 101i losses were inflated by $28 million, which were actual gains.
4.) It included two and a half years of data from a separate company, XTG1, after i2G was closed on all seven of their critical spreadsheets, which were used with nearly every witness.
5.) Witness tampering occurred for 7 years before the trial, announcing to distributors they were fraud victims
6.) Brady, Giglio, and Jenks violated the law by failing to turn over exculpatory and impeachment data from the hard drives of Richard and Susan Anzalone’s computers that they seized before the trial.
The DOJ’s corrupt actions in this case now pose a threat to all multi-level marketing (MLM) businesses and their distributors. You could face criminal prosecution for your recruiting efforts, regardless of who you are or which MLM company you represent. It is crucial to stay informed and advocate for justice to protect your right to pursue your MLM goals.
In the i2G case, prosecutors misled the judge about their witness, Jerry Reynold’s statements, which concerned exonerating commission data that disproved their entire case. After the trial, the data provider issued an affidavit confirming the misconduct, which included filtering out $28 million in gains earned by i2G distributors deemed to be alleged victims. Prosecutors misrepresented a 97% loss rate, falsely portraying $28 million in gains as losses, and presented this misleading information as accurate I2G gain-loss representations through their key expert witnesses. Such actions should constitute fraud on the court and suborning perjury.
Evidence supporting the government’s misconduct comes from sworn statements made by its data provider, “unfiltered” commission data from Reynolds, discovery data, as well as government admissions in their appeal response as to the falsity of the i2G data, specifically the exclusion of $28 million in commission gains, and the inappropriate use of 2.5 years of data from the separate company XTG1, which operated after i2G was closed. This incorrect data was compiled into all seven critical spreadsheets, distorting every statistical representation in the i2G case. Xtg1 reps and product packages were represented as belonging to I2G.
When questioned about the data beyond the established timeline, Sewell misled the judge, claiming it accurately represented i2G. The judge trusted the prosecution, resulting in improper evidentiary admissions that included 2.5 years of non-I2G data from a separate company, XTG1, as well as false summary charts and spreadsheets that significantly inflated loss representations. The government acknowledged data inaccuracies in its appeal response to defend Keep against perjury claims but has never taken steps to correct the record regarding the significance of the staggering $28 million in omitted gains or the two and a half years of data from Xtg1.
The government stated in its response to the appeal that it had never claimed to include all relevant commission data in 101i and that Keep simply analyzed what it provided to him. However, they falsely represented 101i at trial as encompassing ALL i2g gains and losses. The acknowledgment of excluding relevant commission data suggests an intention to commit fraud against the Court and mislead the jury.
The corrupt actions of the DOJ in the i2G case pose a threat to all multi-level marketing (MLM) companies and their distributors.
source
