To a judge the situation where a corrupt cop withholds evidence from a cell phone, claiming it was locked despite a witness stating she gave her password to the officer, would look highly problematic and raise several serious concerns.
1. credibility of the officer
the officers credibility is already compromised due to the corruption charges and resignment. This discrepancy further undermines their trustworthiness
2. Obstruction of Justice
withholding evidence especially intentionally, can be seen as an attempt to obstruct justice. This is a serious offense and an have significant legal consequences for the officer in this case.
3. suppression of evidence
the judge might view the officer’s actions as an attempt to suppress evidence, which can be grounds for legal challenges by the defense. This could include motions to dismiss charges or exclude evidence handled by the officer.
4. due process concerns
the judge would be concerned about potential violations of due process rights. If evidence crucial to the defense was withheld, it could be argued that the defendant’s right to a fair trial was compromised.
5. impact of the case
the judge might scrutinize other evidence and aspects of the investigation more closely, questioning the integrity and reliability of the entire case. This could potentially lead to a re-evaluation of the charges or the investigation’s conduct.
6. witness testimony
the witness’s testimony about providing the password contradicts the officer’s claim, which could be a pivotal point in court . This discrepancy might lead the judge to favor the witness account over the corrupt officer’s
#misconduct #policecorruption #newtrial #juteahdowney #unfairtrial #erroroflaw #corruption #ottawapolice #news #topstories #mediasilence #charterofrights #onatriocourtofappeal #sarastanding #narissasomji #crime #toronto #northpreston #halifax
source
